
02-22-2008, 02:11 PM
|
 |
Manwhore
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 15,495
|
|
Parental responsibility?
I can't believe these parents. If I had done this when I was 13, being expelled would have been the least of my worries. I would have seriously considered running away from home rather than face my parents.
From The Smoking Gun website:
Quote:
The parents of an Ohio boy who was expelled this month for creating a phony MySpace profile that described his middle school's principal as a child molester have filed a federal lawsuit claiming that the 13-year-old's free speech rights have been violated by education officials. Toader and Marianna Osan claim that their son (who is identified only by his initials in U.S. District Court filings) was improperly booted from the eighth grade at Hillside Middle School in Parma after educators learned of the boy's creation of a MySpace page for principal Jeff Cook. The MySpace profile, which was headlined "Your Princeypal," did not carry Cook's name, but it included his photo and identified him as the Hillside Middle School principal. The since-removed profile, an excerpt of which you'll find below, listed Cook's general interests as "giving students anal" and "jacking off in my office," and named his heroes as Michael Jackson, Adolph Hitler, and Saddam Hussein. For his vulgar online handiwork, "M.O." was first suspended, and then, on February 7, was informed that he was being expelled (for "malicious harassment") until June 10, effectively the end of the school year, according to a February 20 court filing. His parents argue that students "disrespecting teachers outside of school is an age-old tradition, and one from which teachers neither need nor deserve protection...It would be naive to think that even the most popular principal is not the subject of student ridicule and parody." The Osans are seeking their son's immediate return to school and a judicial order protecting his off-campus speech, which previously included the observation that Cook had an affinity for the Purple Penetrator, a sex toy.
|
Does anyone think this is covered under free speech?
__________________
Put me on wheels and I'll turn tricks.
Clever? Nah, I ran out of that years ago. But if you find this, let me know, k?
"The road goes ever on..." ~ Tolkien
In memory of my friend skip...
Go then, there are other worlds than these
|

02-22-2008, 02:41 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

02-22-2008, 03:59 PM
|
 |
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
|
|
I :heart: all parents like these... fucking job security.
|

02-22-2008, 04:03 PM
|
 |
pixie of the wood
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,575
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aqua
Does anyone think this is covered under free speech?
|
naw. it's slander without a doubt
|

02-22-2008, 04:40 PM
|
 |
Leo was right
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern Iowa
Posts: 17,778
|
|
Holy crap, if I had pulled something like that I think it would still hurt to this day when I tried to sit down.
That is quite the job of parenting those folks are doing. Certainly wouldn't want your kids to grow up with any sort of respect for an authority figure or anything.
__________________
It takes a gutless mouse to play only when the cat's away.
No love, no friendship, can cross the path of our destiny without leaving some mark on it forever. ~~ Francois Mocuriac
Confucius say, "He who masturbate into cash register come into money."
An optimist looks at the glass and says it's half full. A pessimist looks at the glass and says it's half empty. A Cubs fan looks at the glass and says, "When's it gonna spill?"
Deus Impetitio Esuritori Nullus
|

02-22-2008, 07:11 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,687
|
|
This piece of fun has ramifications at work for the Principal and goes far beyond the ability to get together with other little shits (oops sorry) gentlemen of tomorrow and cast slurs on all and sundry.
This little charmer probably thought he was suitably untouchable behind the computer's anonymous screen, and anyway as a minor he has special protection from the courts.
I say let him back, on the provision that his parents take out a national full page advertisement naming the boy with a full and open retraction of the scurrilous matter and an unreserved apology to the Principal.
After that, in the quiet of a school study period, he can be sacrificed to Chalkius, the God of Education.
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|

02-22-2008, 07:29 PM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
Maybe a multi-million dollar countersuit for libel would bring the parents up to speed on what exactly is covered under the First Amendment?
Nah, fuckwits like that never "get it"...

__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|

02-22-2008, 07:44 PM
|
 |
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
|
|
|

02-22-2008, 07:50 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,687
|
|
And has to walk back to Ohio every afternoon?
That'll do it.
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|

02-23-2008, 10:58 AM
|
 |
Pixie's Resident Reptile
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central MD, USA
Posts: 21,194
|
|
Please inform me when has it been ruled that slander is subject to the protection of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United states?
__________________
On the kinkometer, my kink measures as a sine wave.
|

02-24-2008, 01:51 AM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gekkogecko
Please inform me when has it been ruled that slander is subject to the protection of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United states?
|
The short answer I've always heard is that freedon of speech does not give one the right to yell "Fire!" in a crowded theatre...not sure if that's the right analogy here, but it comes pretty close for my tastes, i.e., false statements with malicious intent are *NOT* covered by the First Amendment...
__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|

02-24-2008, 02:23 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 637
|
|
There are two issues here. The first is that as other have said slander isn't protected speech. The second is that the Supreme Court ruled in the late 80s that students were not afforded First Amendment rights. School newspapers, and annuals aren't covered under the First Amendment since they are sponsored by the schools and therefore the principal or school board have the final say as to what gets published and can dole out punishments if something is printed that they don't like.
It's also one thing to disrespect your teacher it's quite another to spread lies about them that could ruin their career and reputation. I think the principal should file a counter suit claiming irrepairable harm to his career and reputation and sue the parents for every dime they will ever think of making.
|

02-24-2008, 02:39 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,687
|
|
Jude 30,
Students writing in a school paper are a different case to malicious words in an external medium.
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|

02-24-2008, 03:15 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 637
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldfart
Jude 30,
Students writing in a school paper are a different case to malicious words in an external medium.
|
I considered that but thought it bared mentioning that because of all the screaming people do about students freedom of speech these days.
It still doesn't change the fact that slander isn't protected speech.
|

02-24-2008, 05:07 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,687
|
|
Nor is sedition or treason.
Freedom is not anarchy.
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.
|