
09-05-2007, 07:00 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 22,127
|
|
so what's your opinion
guy shoots cop, serves time for attempted murder
cop dies 41 years later, same guy charged with murder
thoughts?
__________________
If someone offers a penny for your thoughts and you put your two cents in, what happens to the other penny??
Don’t let the hardship of the past, take away from the joy of the present
|

09-05-2007, 07:15 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,687
|
|
Harsh.
I see where this is coming from, but if a car is stolen, rebirthed, sold, then accidently runs over someone, is that homcide by the car thief?
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|

09-05-2007, 07:20 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
41 years later? Excessive. Nope.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

09-05-2007, 07:23 AM
|
 |
arOusal art!st!
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Down the road
Posts: 9,268
|
|
I think someone's still bitter. Understandably so, but the shooter did serve his time.
__________________
Variety is the soul of pleasure. ~ Aphra Behn
|

09-05-2007, 07:49 AM
|
 |
pixie of the wood
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,575
|
|
well, it ain't scottish.
comes too close to double jeopardy, they're just creating loopholes.
|

09-05-2007, 07:54 AM
|
 |
Mrs FussyPucker
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 3,635
|
|
I'm sure I heard somewhere that in Britain there's a law where if you die of your injuries up to one year after being attacked or whatever, then the perp can be tried for murder, but if you die of your injuries even a year and one day afterwards then it can only be attempted murder.
I'm not sure if that's right exactly - perhaps I dreamt it, but it would make sense that there's some time scale involved surely?
But if we're going down that road, how about every rapist whose victim eventually commits suicide or becomes a substance abuser and dies from that? Shouldn't they be charged with murder too?
__________________
"Time flies like an arrow -
Fruit flies like a banana"
M Y - N A U G H T Y - P I C T U R E S ! !
|

09-05-2007, 07:57 AM
|
 |
Mrs FussyPucker
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 3,635
|
|
Just to stir the pot a bit?
Would people have different views if the guy had been in a coma for 41 years? Would that make a difference?
__________________
"Time flies like an arrow -
Fruit flies like a banana"
M Y - N A U G H T Y - P I C T U R E S ! !
|

09-05-2007, 08:18 AM
|
 |
is not this trim anymore!
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 21,709
|
|
I disagree with the notion of charging him with murder after all the time that's transpired.
But am interested in hearing why he's still living in a halfway house. If this happened 41 years ago and he served his 15 year sentence...why is he still in the custody of the BOP? It sounds like he's already in the prison system to a certain extent so what good would piling additional charges do other than put him away for what will amount to the rest of his life?
__________________
Though I am different from you,
We were born involved in one another.
For it was not into my ear you whispered, but into my heart. It was not my lips you kissed, but my soul.
Complete surrender should not just come at moments in which one faces overwhelming odds, but in the calm when it seems one is personally in complete control of one's life.
|

09-05-2007, 08:52 AM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
In the US, there no statute of limitations for murder...that said, I think wyndhy's right, if this isn't double jeopardy, it's bumping right up against it...if the cop had died of his injuries before the trial, the attempted murder charges would have gone away, to be replaced by murder charges...so how does the justice system rationalize what is essentially trying the guy for the same crime?
I'm sure they'll come up with something here in the era of zero intelligence...
__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|

09-05-2007, 08:53 AM
|
 |
Everybody Stretch!
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pa. USA
Posts: 11,637
|
|
An infection...in/of what?
There needs to be more info.
If he got infections ever since the incident, due to being paralyzed by the shooter, and one of these infections eventually killed him...than it's the shooter's fault. But if the infections were/are due to neglect or of a more "natural" or everyday nature...than no, it's not the shooter's fault.
Depends on what the infection was from!
__________________
Minds are like parachutes. They only work when they are open.
~Thomas Dewar~
|

09-05-2007, 09:42 AM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LixyChick
An infection...in/of what?
There needs to be more info.
If he got infections ever since the incident, due to being paralyzed by the shooter, and one of these infections eventually killed him...than it's the shooter's fault. But if the infections were/are due to neglect or of a more "natural" or everyday nature...than no, it's not the shooter's fault.
Depends on what the infection was from!
|
I think it was intended to be derived from the second to last paragraph:
Quote:
However, the officer’s sister Rosalyn Harrison has said Barnes should serve time for murder, saying her brother had problems for decades after the shooting including pneumonia, bedsores and recurrent infections.
|
At least that was how I interpreted it...
__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|

09-05-2007, 12:52 PM
|
 |
is not this trim anymore!
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 21,709
|
|
I'm very confused.
One paper said he served a 15 year sentence and now works at a supermarket near the halfway house he's living in.
The second paper said he was finally released in 2005.
Additionally, it was stated that Mr. Barclay's life played out almost exactly as his surgeon had predicted so many years earlier: By his 60s he was bed-bound, unable to care for himself, infection ravaging a body too weak to fight. Barclay died at age 64.
I guess what I'm thinking is that if it was predicted that his life would play out like it indeed did...wouldn't this have been taken consideration when determining the sentence?
__________________
Though I am different from you,
We were born involved in one another.
For it was not into my ear you whispered, but into my heart. It was not my lips you kissed, but my soul.
Complete surrender should not just come at moments in which one faces overwhelming odds, but in the calm when it seems one is personally in complete control of one's life.
|

09-05-2007, 06:03 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,687
|
|
It sounds as if the shooter has spent his life in and out of jail, so if you count concurrence, so I suspect it totally fucked both lives.
The more I think about it, the more I think it's double jeopardy.
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|

09-05-2007, 10:37 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 637
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyndhy
well, it ain't scottish.
comes too close to double jeopardy, they're just creating loopholes.
|
Where's double jeopardy? Last time I checked murder and assault were two separate crimes.
|

09-05-2007, 10:40 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 637
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loulabelle
I'm sure I heard somewhere that in Britain there's a law where if you die of your injuries up to one year after being attacked or whatever, then the perp can be tried for murder, but if you die of your injuries even a year and one day afterwards then it can only be attempted murder.
I'm not sure if that's right exactly - perhaps I dreamt it, but it would make sense that there's some time scale involved surely?
But if we're going down that road, how about every rapist whose victim eventually commits suicide or becomes a substance abuser and dies from that? Shouldn't they be charged with murder too?
|
You're probably thinking of the " Year and a Day Rule". That law was abolished in the UK in 1996.
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 PM.
|