
06-19-2005, 06:49 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Kaelynn,
I’m with Lifetime all the way!
When I was a boy there wasn’t any pornography on the internet! I say that if the FCC can’t regulate pornography off the internet, then the internet should be shut down!
Certain exceptions should be made, of course, for sensitive, artistic treatment that idealizes the human form and exults in the union of kindred souls - http://www.pixies-place.com come to mind in that context.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

06-19-2005, 07:25 AM
|
 |
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
|
|
Unfortunately the FCC/the current administration is closer to having their way than ever before.
|

06-19-2005, 07:51 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Lilith,
Oh yes? What have those lovable souls been up to this time? 
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

06-19-2005, 07:57 AM
|
 |
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
|
|
|

06-19-2005, 08:06 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Lilith,
I'm happy to learn that the Federal Government (granted, in a slow, plodding way) has followed Pixies lead in attempting to eliminate exploitation of children.
Yet again, Pixies Place is leading edge! 
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

06-19-2005, 08:14 AM
|
 |
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
|
|
I'm not in support of the statutes as they are currently written they suppress free speech and expression for consenting adults unless steps are taken, steps that could raise privacy issues.
|

06-19-2005, 11:18 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The Prairies, Canada
Posts: 2,829
|
|
The US administration wants to control adult content on the internet, but was unwilling to support the ban on automatic assault weapons?
|

06-19-2005, 01:04 PM
|
 |
Loungin' Around
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West Coast
Posts: 30,587
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lilith
I'm not in support of the statutes as they are currently written they suppress free speech and expression for consenting adults unless steps are taken, steps that could raise privacy issues.
|
Does this rule apply to Pixies (it sounds as though it does)? And if yes, how will these records be kept, and how will age be validated?
Do we have to go back and provide informaiton for historical pics? And will we need to take off pics that cannot be validated?
So many questions..... 
__________________
Life is too short not to love and be loved....preferably multiple times in one night.
I think men talk to women so they can sleep with them and women sleep with men so they can talk to them. ~ Jay McInerney
|

06-19-2005, 01:05 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
campingboy,
I may be wrong in my interpretation of the page to which the link above takes us, but it seems to me that it refers to “new and improved” rules which enable federal inspectors to verify that the actors in sexually explicit internet content are not children.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casec...ction_2257.html
In and of itself, that seems to be a reasonable goal of the law passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law eons ago (1988):
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casec...2257_notes.html ref. the “Effective Date”.
Here in the States, it is relatively easy for Congress to meddle in business activities, as Section 8 of Article I of the Constitution grants it permission to do so. Changing the rules regarding gun ownership has proven to be considerably more difficult, as the Second Amendment to the Constitution “guarantees” that “right”.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/...on/amendment02/
This has proven to be one of the most contentious amendments to the Constitution, second only to the one which limits its ability to establish or suppress religions or to suppress free speech. Interestingly, those are addressed by the First Amendment to the Constitution.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/...on/amendment01/
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

06-19-2005, 01:38 PM
|
 |
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by osuche
Does this rule apply to Pixies (it sounds as though it does)? And if yes, how will these records be kept, and how will age be validated?
Do we have to go back and provide informaiton for historical pics? And will we need to take off pics that cannot be validated?
So many questions..... 
|
Quick answer.....I'm not sure yet. As I know, I promise you will too. There are still appeals before the courts.
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 PM.
|