
08-27-2007, 03:50 PM
|
 |
Manwhore
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 15,495
|
|
Mattel sues porn website over use of Barbie name
(gg)
Original Story here
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Mattel Inc. sued a small company on Tuesday for using the toymaker's famed "Barbie" trademark as part of the name for a pornographic Web site it owned.
The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court, said the Web site www.chinabarbie.com had used the Barbie trademark to capture the positive image Mattel had created through its "Barbie" products.
The suit, which seeks unspecified damages, said the company, Global China Networks LLC, was based in Florida with a postal address in New York and had sold memberships to the site to customers around the world.
Mattel co-founder Ruth Handler in 1959 created the Barbie doll after noticing her daughter preferred playing with paper cut-outs of adult female fashion dolls, the lawsuit said.
American girls aged between 3 and 11 own an average of eight Barbie dolls each, the lawsuit said.
__________________
Put me on wheels and I'll turn tricks.
Clever? Nah, I ran out of that years ago. But if you find this, let me know, k?
"The road goes ever on..." ~ Tolkien
In memory of my friend skip...
Go then, there are other worlds than these
|

08-27-2007, 06:17 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
I bet that Mattel will take no prisoners in this case.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

08-27-2007, 10:21 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,687
|
|
Beyond the name, I can't see anything in the site sampler that has anything to do with the Mattel product.
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|

08-28-2007, 10:22 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Neither could I. I suspect that as soon as Mattel gets the 'barbie' dropped from the web site, they will drop their case.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

08-28-2007, 12:59 PM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
Strikes me as another example of corperate bullying, or the 800-pound-gorrilla syndrome, kinda like how Disney threatened to go after the MPAA a few years back for using Snow White in a really bad song-&-dance bit during the Oscar ceremonies...I mean, come on, do they really think they can own the name "Barbie"?
__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|

08-28-2007, 02:28 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotzoidman
... do they really think they can own the name "Barbie"?
|
scotzoidman,
I think Mattel does have 'Barbie' trademarked.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

08-31-2007, 08:42 AM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldfart
Beyond the name, I can't see anything in the site sampler that has anything to do with the Mattel product.
|
I see the same...as a friend once pointed out, sometimes filing a nuisence suit can be its own reward...whether Mattel is sucessful or not may depend more on the resources available to chinabarbie.com & if they feel it's worthwhile to fight or not...
__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.
|