Live Chat

Go Back   Pixies Place Forums > Site News > Sex News
User Name
Password


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2006, 05:19 PM
Lilith's Avatar
Lilith Lilith is offline
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
Send a message via Yahoo to Lilith
Feds Seek Google Records in Porn Probe

By Associated Press


SAN JOSE, Calif. - The Bush administration, seeking to revive an online pornography law struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, has subpoenaed Google Inc. for details on what its users have been looking for through its popular search engine.

Google has refused to comply with the subpoena, issued last year, for a broad range of material from its databases, including a request for 1 million random Web addresses and records of all Google searches from any one-week period, lawyers for the U.S. Justice Department said in papers filed Wednesday in federal court in San Jose.

Privacy advocates have been increasingly scrutinizing Google's practices as the company expands its offerings to include e-mail, driving directions, photo-sharing, instant messaging and Web journals.

Although Google pledges to protect personal information, the company's privacy policy says it complies with legal and government requests. Google also has no stated guidelines on how long it keeps data, leading critics to warn that retention is potentially forever given cheap storage costs.

The government contends it needs the data to determine how often pornography shows up in online searches as part of an effort to revive an Internet child protection law that was struck down two years ago by the U.S. Supreme Court on free-speech grounds.

The 1998 Child Online Protection Act would have required adults to use access codes or other ways of registering before they could see objectionable material online, and it would have punished violators with fines up to $50,000 or jail time. The high court ruled that technology such as filtering software may better protect children.

The matter is now before a federal court in Pennsylvania, and the government wants the Google data to help argue that the law is more effective than software in protecting children from porn.

The Mountain View-based company told The San Jose Mercury News that it opposes releasing the information because it would violate the privacy rights of its users and would reveal company trade secrets.

Nicole Wong, an associate general counsel for Google, said the company will fight the government's efforts "vigorously."

"Google is not a party to this lawsuit, and the demand for the information is overreaching," Wong said.
__________________

The practice of putting women on pedestals began to die out when it was discovered that they could give orders better from there.~ Betty Grable

If I wanted your opinion, I'd remove the duct tape and ask you for it.~ Me
<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>
One man's dream is another man's nightmare~~~~> §¤ Lilith ¤§

~>My Scribbles<~
==>Gone Shopping<== ~Just a Quickie~ *~A Celebration Vacation~* ~Surprises~ Sleeping With the Window Open
What Did You Do Today? Self Defense Class ~Short Sweet Snippets~ § Summer Spin § Story Challenge Submission Pajamas
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-20-2006, 10:55 AM
gekkogecko's Avatar
gekkogecko gekkogecko is offline
Pixie's Resident Reptile
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central MD, USA
Posts: 21,196
What is Google worried about? The Feds aren't going to mis-use this information.

Of course, we all know that Iraq was crawling with weapons of mass destruction, that Samuel Alito is a raging moderate, that the last two national elections were entirely fraud-free, that government conducted eavesdropping on private conversations is completely constitutional, adn that King George II, excuse me, George W Bush keeps his promises to fire anyone on the white house staff who leaks sensitive information that might endanger the lives of US citizens.
__________________
On the kinkometer, my kink measures as a sine wave.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-20-2006, 11:29 PM
Cheyanne's Avatar
Cheyanne Cheyanne is offline
Suprise Me
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,259
^^^ Shouldn't White House be capitalized? roflmao!
__________________
A blessed thing it is for any man or woman to have a friend, one human soul whom we can trust utterly, who knows the best and worst of us, and who loves us in spite of all our faults.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-21-2006, 12:46 AM
scotzoidman's Avatar
scotzoidman scotzoidman is offline
Turn it up!
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
Send a message via AIM to scotzoidman Send a message via Yahoo to scotzoidman
Quote:
Originally Posted by gekkogecko
What is Google worried about? The Feds aren't going to mis-use this information.

Of course, we all know that Iraq was crawling with weapons of mass destruction, that Samuel Alito is a raging moderate, that the last two national elections were entirely fraud-free, that government conducted eavesdropping on private conversations is completely constitutional, adn that King George II, excuse me, George W Bush keeps his promises to fire anyone on the white house staff who leaks sensitive information that might endanger the lives of US citizens.

I've heard the phrase, "dripping with sarcasm" before, but had never seen such a great example until now
__________________
Plug me into somethin'

If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.

No good deed ever goes unpunished

Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-21-2006, 05:36 AM
Zelezniy's Avatar
Zelezniy Zelezniy is offline
No sir!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CSA capital
Posts: 82
Send a message via MSN to Zelezniy Send a message via Yahoo to Zelezniy
seen this today ... good thing google ain't badging in ... interweb is the last bit of freedom we got
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-22-2006, 02:03 PM
gekkogecko's Avatar
gekkogecko gekkogecko is offline
Pixie's Resident Reptile
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central MD, USA
Posts: 21,196
OK, just for shit and grins, I did a Google search on the phrase George W Bush is a fuckhead. In quotes.




Thirteen hits.
__________________
On the kinkometer, my kink measures as a sine wave.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-22-2006, 03:44 PM
LixyChick's Avatar
LixyChick LixyChick is offline
Everybody Stretch!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pa. USA
Posts: 11,637
Oh nooooooooo! Now I have to rethink my investment in 5 shares of Google!

Anyone see the price of that stock lately? Holy friggin Moly!!!!

Hey G.W.? Bite me...ass and all!
__________________
Minds are like parachutes. They only work when they are open.

~Thomas Dewar~
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-18-2006, 09:54 PM
RandyGal's Avatar
RandyGal RandyGal is offline
Registered Dork
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by gekkogecko
OK, just for shit and grins, I did a Google search on the phrase George W Bush is a fuckhead. In quotes.




Thirteen hits.



LMAO!!

I'm surprised it wasn't more though!!

What I don't understand is I've googled "WMD" before and soooooo many other things, yep some pervy, looking for information on the topics.......are we not allowed to seek INFORMATION about things anymore?


Wake me when the reign of King George is over please......


.
__________________
Everyone knows that laugher is great foreplay!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.