
08-27-2007, 03:50 PM
|
 |
Manwhore
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 15,495
|
|
Mattel sues porn website over use of Barbie name
(gg)
Original Story here
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Mattel Inc. sued a small company on Tuesday for using the toymaker's famed "Barbie" trademark as part of the name for a pornographic Web site it owned.
The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court, said the Web site www.chinabarbie.com had used the Barbie trademark to capture the positive image Mattel had created through its "Barbie" products.
The suit, which seeks unspecified damages, said the company, Global China Networks LLC, was based in Florida with a postal address in New York and had sold memberships to the site to customers around the world.
Mattel co-founder Ruth Handler in 1959 created the Barbie doll after noticing her daughter preferred playing with paper cut-outs of adult female fashion dolls, the lawsuit said.
American girls aged between 3 and 11 own an average of eight Barbie dolls each, the lawsuit said.
__________________
Put me on wheels and I'll turn tricks.
Clever? Nah, I ran out of that years ago. But if you find this, let me know, k?
"The road goes ever on..." ~ Tolkien
In memory of my friend skip...
Go then, there are other worlds than these
|

08-27-2007, 06:17 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
I bet that Mattel will take no prisoners in this case.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

08-27-2007, 10:21 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,687
|
|
Beyond the name, I can't see anything in the site sampler that has anything to do with the Mattel product.
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|

08-28-2007, 10:22 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Neither could I. I suspect that as soon as Mattel gets the 'barbie' dropped from the web site, they will drop their case.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

08-28-2007, 12:59 PM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
Strikes me as another example of corperate bullying, or the 800-pound-gorrilla syndrome, kinda like how Disney threatened to go after the MPAA a few years back for using Snow White in a really bad song-&-dance bit during the Oscar ceremonies...I mean, come on, do they really think they can own the name "Barbie"?
__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|

08-28-2007, 02:28 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotzoidman
... do they really think they can own the name "Barbie"?
|
scotzoidman,
I think Mattel does have 'Barbie' trademarked.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

08-28-2007, 04:39 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,687
|
|
There is a limit to trademarking, as McDonalds are currently finding.
Does that classic Paul Hogan ad exhorting Yanks to visit Oz have to be re-shot so we can "Chuck another shrimp on the non-Mattel cooking device"?
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|

08-28-2007, 05:07 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Oldfart,
Could be, but I figure that Mattel will be going after this porn site with all the zeal, and if I might hazard a guess with similar results, as the music companies went after Napster.
Different legal principles, but I can just see their lawyers painting a picture of the "essential innocence " of their market being "corrupted" by "pornography" "hiding behind" "Mattel's good name and reputation"!
That's a made-to-order suit.
It will be interesting to watch this play out.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

08-30-2007, 11:11 AM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
Mattel may own the name for purposes of the doll & associated properties, but I don't see them having the right to any & all uses of the name...OF makes a valid point of where this could go if carried to its ridiculous extreme...
__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|

08-30-2007, 12:42 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Too true.
But for commercial purposes, which the porn site in question can reasonably be described as pursuing at the expense of - oh how sad it is - the good name and outstanding reputation of the Mattel Corp, I do think that Mattel's legal staff have a strong case to present to the court.
The link still works. We shall see.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

08-31-2007, 08:42 AM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldfart
Beyond the name, I can't see anything in the site sampler that has anything to do with the Mattel product.
|
I see the same...as a friend once pointed out, sometimes filing a nuisence suit can be its own reward...whether Mattel is sucessful or not may depend more on the resources available to chinabarbie.com & if they feel it's worthwhile to fight or not...
__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|

08-31-2007, 01:04 PM
|
 |
is not this trim anymore!
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 21,709
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldfart
"Chuck another shrimp on the non-Mattel cooking device"?
|
I'm sorry but you can't say that...Chuck is the nickname Peppermint Patty uses for Charlie Brown.
Oh shit! I meant to say "Chuck is the nickname a girl named after a dark chocolate covered peppermint confection produced by the Hershey Foods Corporation, under license from Peter Paul, uses for Charlie Brown."
__________________
Though I am different from you,
We were born involved in one another.
For it was not into my ear you whispered, but into my heart. It was not my lips you kissed, but my soul.
Complete surrender should not just come at moments in which one faces overwhelming odds, but in the calm when it seems one is personally in complete control of one's life.
|

08-31-2007, 11:42 PM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
<watching WI spiraling down the black hole of trademark infringement>
"Alas, I knew him well..."
__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|

09-01-2007, 05:56 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,687
|
|
Try our new "Yorick" brand infringement, when only the best will do, and isn't that most of the time?
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|

10-26-2007, 08:09 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Gentlefolk,
Let us pause for a moment, and reflect upon the seeming demise of a site which strayed too close to one of scotzoidman’s 800-pound-gorillas.
ChinaBarbie, we hardly knew ye...
__________________
Eudaimonia
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.
|