Live Chat

Go Back   Pixies Place Forums > Site News > Sex News
User Name
Password


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-27-2005, 07:28 PM
Lilith's Avatar
Lilith Lilith is offline
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
Send a message via Yahoo to Lilith
Masturbating Canadian Wins Court Challenge

(submitted by BIBI)
World - Canada



OTTAWA (Reuters) - A Canadian who masturbated at a window in his house won his appeal against a conviction for indecency on Thursday after Canada's top court ruled there was no evidence of intent to commit an indecent act, and a home was not a public place.



The Supreme Court of Canada noted that British Columbian, Daryl Clark, had agreed it was an indecent act to have masturbated "in an illuminated room near an uncovered window visible to neighbors."


But Justice Morris Fish, writing the 9-0 decision, said such acts have to be done in public places to be a crime -- and a home was not a public place. The law also says indecent acts are only crimes in every location if the person intends to give offense.


Clark was convicted of an indecent act in a public place and given a four-month sentence after a prosecution that followed complaints from his neighbor, named in court documents only as Mrs. S.


The woman said she spotted Clark while she was watching television with her two young daughters in their family room.


She alerted her husband, and the couple observed Clark from their darkened bedroom for 10 or 15 minutes -- also using binoculars and a telescope -- before summoning the police, who said the upper part of Clark's body was visible from just below the navel.


"In my respectful view, the trial judge ... erred in concluding that the appellant's living room had been converted by him into a public place simply because he could be seen through his living room window and, though he did not know this, was being watched by Mr. and Mrs. S. from the privacy of their own bedroom 90 to 150 feet away," Fish wrote.


The supreme court ordered that Clark be acquitted.
__________________

The practice of putting women on pedestals began to die out when it was discovered that they could give orders better from there.~ Betty Grable

If I wanted your opinion, I'd remove the duct tape and ask you for it.~ Me
<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>
One man's dream is another man's nightmare~~~~> §¤ Lilith ¤§

~>My Scribbles<~
==>Gone Shopping<== ~Just a Quickie~ *~A Celebration Vacation~* ~Surprises~ Sleeping With the Window Open
What Did You Do Today? Self Defense Class ~Short Sweet Snippets~ § Summer Spin § Story Challenge Submission Pajamas
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-27-2005, 08:06 PM
BIBI's Avatar
BIBI BIBI is offline
Made in England
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,180
Thanks Lil....

I love how the couple did everything but go up to his window and watch.

LOL....a flippin' telescope and watched for 10 to15 minutes to boot!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2005, 10:29 AM
cbass1976's Avatar
cbass1976 cbass1976 is offline
Kick His Ass
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 7,252
what a WACKEY story
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-28-2005, 10:38 AM
gekkogecko's Avatar
gekkogecko gekkogecko is offline
Pixie's Resident Reptile
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central MD, USA
Posts: 21,196
Wonderful how the powers that be bitch and moan about how legal techicalities let so-called "criminals" of scott-free, but fail to mention that they have already done everything in their power to make criminals of people in their own home by twisting every legal technicality they can.

Own home...binoculars...telescope. yeah, sounds like a public place to em, all right.

Fuckheads.
__________________
On the kinkometer, my kink measures as a sine wave.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-28-2005, 06:22 PM
SuzyQ's Avatar
SuzyQ SuzyQ is offline
Wet Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 5,640
Our dumb Canadian laws...The charged person is named, but the people that turn him in are anonymous...go figuure. He should charge them with invasion of HIS privacy, can't be invasion of his private parts because they didn't see them!
__________________
Susan
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-29-2005, 07:55 AM
Mark Vieth's Avatar
Mark Vieth Mark Vieth is offline
Freeze!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 482
Send a message via MSN to Mark Vieth
Hey maybe Mrs S was pissed off because she had married the wrong guy!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-30-2005, 07:26 PM
SuzyQ's Avatar
SuzyQ SuzyQ is offline
Wet Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 5,640
Never thought of that,,,,but I also wonder how long they had been spying. We have a peeping tom law in Canada
__________________
Susan
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-05-2005, 07:52 AM
dicksbro's Avatar
dicksbro dicksbro is offline
Just me.
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West central Illinois
Posts: 590,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuzyQ
We have a peeping tom law in Canada


Sponsoring or forbidding??

Just kidding.



BTW, could those people who pressed charges be called, PT Crusiers?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.