Okay, so the bill says that suspect drivers will be videorecorded and then tested if it seems they are impaired, yet the article says the testing is random? Did I miss something? Is the random testing in support of the existing law forbidding "driving or being in charge of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug"?

And while I'm on that subject, is it not patently ridiculous to have a law against "driving or being in charge of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug", and an additional law forbidding "driving or being in charge of a motor vehicle while impaired by a drug"? How difficult would it be to make this one law?

__________________
I want to know everything
I want to be everywhere
I want to fuck everyone in the world
I want to do something that matters