The man in the attached article is a paedophile who used his occupation to further his perversions. He was in a position of trust and by virtue of his craft was allowed to free reign with children. Sometimes the only concrete proof is pictures that enable a charge to stick, but there are times that words alone by children have been enough to garner enough to charge these creeps.

The teacher in my kids school had no pics......just the words for a few brave young girls who told the truth.
Pictures are undeniable proof....and as for age of consent, most paedophiles do not adhere to that statute. They go for the age that feeds their so called natural needs, whether it is a 2 year old or a 14 year old. Age has nothing to do with it if a child tells that he/she has been forced or coherced into doing something sexual that they don't want to do. It is called sexual assault......not bonking.