Titgirl---As I said in a previous thread,I wasn't circumcised until my
40s,because of an earlier clotting problem.In my 40s,my Dr. suggested that I have it done,because of a rash,that I was getting.Evidently,this problem,happens quite often & has nothing
to do with cleanliness.I,nor my wife,have noticed,NO difference in
sensitivity in any sexual act.The only problem,encountered,was not getting a "hardon"after having, at least ,one orgasm a day,
since my early teens.When I had a foreskin,it was so short,that
with an erection,it almost looked as if I were circumcised,so I
imagine,that it would depend on his foreskin length & tightness.
Irish
P.S.There is even a medical name for the rash condition.

__________________
Irish---Better to be dead & cool,then alive & uncool!
(Harley Davidson & the Marlboro Man)