View Single Post
  #41  
Old 10-31-2011, 06:54 PM
jseal jseal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fangtasia
You really are stupid lol ...

I'll leave that beside your frogshit.

Quote:
... I didnt take many pictures prior to digital age, what i did take i didnt manipulate at all (no darkroom) nor have i to this day ...

I'm not surprised that you did not have then, nor have now, a darkroom. It cost (and still costs) big $$$ for a darkroom with the tools needed to manipulate analog photographs.

Quote:
... You just dont get it, i dont really manipulate my photos, as stated if i feel it needs that much work i just reshoot ...

That too is a result of transitioning from analog photography to digital photography. When a roll of 24 or 36 Kodachrome cost real money, one thought before shooting. But that's not something I miss.

Quote:
... If i do manipulate a photo to me it is no longer a photo (as in the original) but art, and art is how the artist sees it ...

That doesn't change the fact that before the digital age of photography, photograph manipulation was the domain of the professional who had invested the $$$ in the necessary tools. Now any Tom, Dick, or Harry can, and often do.

Quote:
... I appreciate the photo/art for what it is and the photographer/artist for what they achieved, wether it be stuff from the dark ages or stuff done now or stuff to come in the future ...

While interesting, and no doubt true, that has nothing to do with the fact that before digital photography, people rarely, if ever (you being a perfect example) manipulated their photographs. "Why" do I hear you ask? Well, I'm glad you did, because that gives me the opportunity to let you know that it was very difficult.

Quote:
... I dont own photoshop, nor have any interest in doing so ...

Congratulations, I guess.

Quote:
... The authenticity of photos has in the past and always will be suspect that has never changed, it has nothing to do with technology ...

Nonsense. Photographic evidence was routinely admitted in court, and the reason it was was because faking a photo well enough to fool the court was beyond the means of almost everyone.
__________________
Eudaimonia
Reply With Quote