Wicked Wanda,
I am not altogether certain how to take your rant post, (post # 34), as you address it to me
Quote:
|
... jseal, at the risk of repeating points already made here.
|
... but end it
Quote:
|
... So:Put your money where your HALF FUCKING ASSED IGNORANT PSEUDO SCIENTIFIC BELIEFS ARE, RHONDA AND MARGO.
|
to the pharmacists.
Still, as you do seem to be responding to posts of mine in at least a few places, the least I can do is to respond where I seem to be the individual to whom you are directing your comments.
Quote:
|
1. Pharmacists are licensed by the State ...
|
No arguments there. Being licensed however does not prevent the plaintiffs from challenging the licensing authority. At least not that I am aware of. Am I mistaken?
Quote:
2. The argument that this is a new issue
"I need only point out that the rules of the game were changed after the pharmacists had made their career decisions" is fallacious at the very FUCKING least ...
|
No. It is not fallacious. It is because it is a new issue the pharmacists were entitled to file the lawsuit in question. They have
legal standing, which is the legal right to initiate a lawsuit. To do so, a person must be affected by the law being challenged, and the controversy can be resolved by legal action. As the Federal court accepted that the plaintiffs have legal standing, I am comfortable in stating that you are mistaken.
Quote:
3. The rule violates their religious and moral beliefs.
If I accept your arguement, ...
|
I did not make that argument.
Quote:
4. Causes death of a fertilized egg, thus ends a life.
BULLFUCKING SHIT!!!
|
This is where you weirded me out. As I said the exact opposite, I must assume that here you have redirected your rant from me to the pharmacists in Washington State. Permit me to post the relevant portion of post #11.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jseal
... In this instance, as the intent, object and goal of the prescription is to NOT induce a spontaneous abortion as does, for example RU-486, but only to prevent conception, then I believe that these objecting pharmacists’ are on rather shakier ethical ground than they may think. The purported death of the baby can not occur as a result of what the pharmacist dispenses, as the fetus is human following conception, not before ...
|
Perhaps you overlooked that part of my post.
I hope your mood changes for the better.