I’m not familiar with the person or the case, but I would first ask if he was a US or British citizen. If a crime was committed in one country and the accused was a citizen, at home, in another country, I want to know what agreements the countries have for such issues. If there is no consensus between the governments, then an international court should make a judgment to IT’S STANDARDS, based on the information provided by the two governments. Neither that international court, or any other government, should have enforcement rights of IT’S VERDICT and sentence until the person was given over by an authority within it’s jurisdiction.

All this hypothesizing is not really a concern though. Your illustration sounded to me like a crime against another person. That will never have the priority of $$$ matters or an offence against a ‘system’. You and I and our families are utterly meaningless in such matters.

__________________