03-01-2006, 12:07 PM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PantyFanatic
[*heard high in the sky from a screaming eagle*]
82nd ? ……….figures! 
LOL  (couldn’t resist  )
While the term “GI” (government issue) doesn’t make a person the ‘property’ of the Army, it is a voluntary military which has the TOTAL authority over the individual soldier [even with the Pink Barrettes (“don’t ask/don’t tell”)]. They no longer issue US serial numbers (draftees).
That’s not a question of what they were doing. It’s a matter of the rules and laws the men agreed to.
"wrongfully engaging in sexual acts with another person while being filmed with the intent of broadcasting the images over the Internet for money."
If there is a stated regulation covering these actions, they can and should be held to the directive.
|
still, it has always seemed to me that the military just shoots itself in the foot when it spends big bucks training these people (esp. the ELITE troops), then tosses them out for infractions that in no way impede their ability to serve...of course, the term Military Intelligence has always been everybody's favorite oxymoron...
__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|