Just a thought...

If a man wants to be a "loving father", I feel like he should find a mate who is as willing to provide him with a child.

In other words...in most cases where a woman wants to end a pregnancy, the pregnancy was an accident on both participant's parts. The only scenario I can think of where both parties would want to have a baby together and then after conception chose to abort, would be for a medical necessity of some sort. All in all, it's usually an accidental pregnancy.

That said, it seems to me that the "couple" (and I use the term lightly) should have discussed their views on the "what if's" well before such an incident occurs. Most often, this is NOT the case. Ergo the term "accident".

After such an "accident", why should it then be OK for the man to decide the fate of the woman and therefore the unborn child based solely on HIS feelings and morals? Is she just a vessel? Doesn't this unwanted/accidental pregnancy impact her life far more than it does his?

Just a thought...

P.S. ROFLMAO@jseal! Looks like I may have some new friends. Thanks for the link hun!

__________________
Minds are like parachutes. They only work when they are open.

~Thomas Dewar~