Foreskin, or No Foreskin??
 

One for the ladies.

Do you prefer a guy to be circumcised or with a foreskin?

Just in case you wanted to know, I do have a foreskin

I voted circumsized because that is all I have ever had. But I really don't care as long as he can use it well. :)

I vote foreskin because my best lovers have had it but that's not a scientific study by any means. :D

Thanks for the response, keep them cumming!

One of my reasons for this post was that my housemate said she prefered no foreskin for 2 reason.

1. there is no need for it and it gets in the way (you have to pull it back when u put a condom on anyway)

2. Because its always exposed and rubbing against stuff all day long, she thinks it de-sensitises it, and therefore last longer when its inside her!

Anyone agree?

i think steph and i need to get together to confirm that study :D

Well this is interesting... Here I am doing a restoration of my cut foreskin that may take 2-3 years and now I read the results of the poll...

Now what?

I agree w/Sharni; the most important thing is if it's clean. However, if I had to choose, I would choose uncut...probably because that is what I am must accustomed to. I also like it better because you don't have to mess around w/a lube when giving a hand job. I never know quite what to do w/a cut one.

As most of you know,I wasn't circumcised until late in life.I then had it done,because of medical neccessity.I notice NO difference,
in sensitivity,in any sexual act.My wife has had me,both ways,&
she notices NO difference either.The comminication,between our-
selves,is good enough,that she wouldn't,just say that,to spare
my feelings.If I had a choice,barring medical reasons,I would have
it done at birth!Try going for days,without an erection,when you have been orgasming,at least,once a day,since youth! Irish

Foreskin - and this is coming from a male BTW. Besides, when a bloke has a full on hard erection, the dick is so big the foreskin is naturally pulled back.