Pixies Place Forums

Pixies Place Forums (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Chat (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Here’s Something Interesting (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27613)

jseal 03-02-2006 05:39 PM

Here’s Something Interesting
 
A new (March 1) survey reports that only 28% of Americans were able to name more than one of the five freedoms granted to them by the First Amendment. However, 52% can name at least two members of “The Simpsons” family. While more than 20% of the participants were able to name all of the Simpsons family members, less than 1% of those surveyed were able to name all five freedoms found in the First Amendment.

More than 40% surveyed could name two of the three “American Idol” judges and 25% could name all three. Only 8 % could name at least three of their First Amendment freedoms.

That’s not all. About 20% of those surveyed agreed that the First Amendment granted them the right to own and raise pets, about the same percentage as those who believe that the right to drive is guaranteed by the First Amendment.

http://www.mccormicktribune.org/mcc...ults_Report.pdf

Scarecrow 03-02-2006 05:58 PM

So we now know what is really important, the right to drive.

osuche 03-02-2006 06:00 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarecrow
So we now know what is really important, the right to drive.



And The Simpsons. :D

PantyFanatic 03-02-2006 11:18 PM

And they can vote. :eek:

Oldfart 03-02-2006 11:39 PM

But don't you drive on the right??

osuche 03-02-2006 11:56 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by PantyFanatic
And they can vote. :eek:



Unfortunately, they outnumber us...and they do vote. :D

scotzoidman 03-03-2006 11:36 AM

I'm more concerned about the right to arm Bears...do we we really want them to be able to shoot back?

PantyFanatic 03-03-2006 12:00 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by scotzoidman
...do we we really want them to be able to shoot back?

YES!




:D

WildIrish 03-03-2006 02:23 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by scotzoidman
I'm more concerned about the right to arm Bears...do we we really want them to be able to shoot back?




I'd rather see the quails shooting back. :D

wyndhy 03-03-2006 03:07 PM

hmmmmmm...freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom to sue anybody for anything :rolleyes:, freedom of worship and, uhm.........can't remember the fifth one


marge, homer, lisa, bart, maggie, snowballs 1,2,3 and santa's little helper....oh! and homer's dad, abe.


oh my god! i'm one of them! :o

i promise not to vote :p:D

jbh3 03-03-2006 03:44 PM

I always vote for the Blue team , but there seems to be more red states on the map than blue ones.....I don't understand? :confused:

Debbie_007 03-03-2006 05:29 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by wyndhy
...can't remember the fifth one

marge, homer, lisa, bart, maggie, snowballs 1,2,3 and santa's little helper....oh! and homer's dad, abe.

oh my god! i'm one of them! :o


The fifth one is about self incrimination, I think.

AND, you forgot Marg's sisters Patty and Selma, Marg's Mom, Homer's Mom, and Homer's half bother Herb, (and Herb's Mom too, I guess).

I'm one of 'em too :D !

Scarecrow 03-03-2006 06:23 PM

So what number is the Right to drink Beer :eek:

rabbit 03-03-2006 07:37 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jseal
A new (March 1) survey reports that only 28% of Americans were able to name more than one of the five freedoms granted to them by the First Amendment. However, 52% can name at least two members of “The Simpsons” family. While more than 20% of the participants were able to name all of the Simpsons family members, less than 1% of those surveyed were able to name all five freedoms found in the First Amendment.

More than 40% surveyed could name two of the three “American Idol” judges and 25% could name all three. Only 8 % could name at least three of their First Amendment freedoms.

That’s not all. About 20% of those surveyed agreed that the First Amendment granted them the right to own and raise pets, about the same percentage as those who believe that the right to drive is guaranteed by the First Amendment.

http://www.mccormicktribune.org/mcc...ults_Report.pdf


This is sad. Just fucking sad.

tsk

gekkogecko 03-05-2006 12:33 AM

Sadly, even I must admit to not being able to being able to name all five freedomw "guarranteed" by the First amendment.

I had forgotten the freedom to petition the government for redress of grievances.

And no, I really couldn't name all of the Simpson, either. Don't pay much attention to the show.

sadly, it seems increasingly irrelevant whether or not people name these freedoms, as they are increasingly prevented from exercising them.

gekkogecko 03-05-2006 12:43 AM

Oh, BTW, the other four...Wyndhy was close:

Freedom of speech
Freedom of religion
Freedom of the press
Freedom to peacably assemble

BruceandNan 03-05-2006 12:56 AM

What about your freedom to call your ACLU lawyer when you hear a prayer on school grounds. just kidding. We have no freedoms left anymore because are judical branch of our government has taken them away. Them and all the ingrates that have immagrated to our country, who believe we have to change for them, and them not to change to our way of life.

Sorry, I am on a soap box, but America is the greatest nation on the planet, just give us back our 5 basic freedoms.

Lilith 03-05-2006 08:08 AM

Like my right to post my naked ass on the web???? Oh right, I forgot this administration has put an end to everyone seeing my end.

jseal 03-05-2006 01:49 PM

BruceandNan,

Try not to be too hard on the Judiciary. In this democracy, their primary role is to interpret the law, not to make it.

The soapbox we have here has been protected from the Communications Decency Act as implemented by President Clinton’s then Attorney General, Janet Reno. It was the ACLU that argued the case (Reno v. ACLU, 1997) which led the Supreme Court to rule that the CDA's "indecent transmission" and "patently offensive display" provisions abridge "the freedom of speech" protected by the First Amendment.

It was also the ACLU which argued the case against COPA (Ashcroft v. ACLU, 2004), also leading to a Supreme Court ruling against the legislation.

I think that the legislature and the executive branches bear the burden of the restriction on our freedoms, and THAT we can do something about.

jbh3 03-05-2006 02:42 PM

For every ACLU case "for " freedom of speech there are 10 more against my right to say "nigger"..."Kike"..."Mick"(me)..."Dago"!!!
I don't use these words by choice,and that is the key:choice!!
They do more damage than good.
Is it still a $25 fine to say the N word in public in Baltimore City?--PATHETIC!!

wyndhy 03-06-2006 08:54 AM

ah, yes...assemble.

apparantly showing your ass is not peaceful enough....no wonder i forgot that one. :rolleyes:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.