Pixies Place Forums

Pixies Place Forums (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Chat (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   New Picture Posting Q & A (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25437)

wrestlemark 07-13-2005 09:11 AM

i'd like to see those...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyndhy
i am registered independent but i consider myself conservative, ideologically speaking.
*puts on her sexy chick cop uniform and starts to swing the baton*
;)




hey how bout a new thread list everyone who wants to be copied to see all those great pics we can't see anymore :hair: this is drivin me f...en nuts i love my pixies ladies...iwanna see em!!!! :nopics:

wyndhy 07-13-2005 09:48 AM

LOL........wouldn't do it for me....it's a shy thing here. :p

i say you just ask, mark....what's the worst that could happen? they say no. (and somehow i really doubt that would happen anyway ;) )

PalaceGuard 07-15-2005 07:03 PM

jseal - Glad to see you working the political end of the thread. The trend line has not been favorable to you Dems over the last few years, has it? If you really want to regain control of the Federal governmant, take your suggestion to heart. Stop wasting your time trying to demonizing the Republicans. That tactic has been a failure. You guys need to figure out how to present your agenda better than the Republicans. Not just that your agenda is better than theirs, but you've got to move the product!

You might also try nominating people who will win, rather than those who are ideologicaly pure. Remember that while it may be the party faithful, the activists, who are willing to bust their asses to get the right candidate nominated, if she doesn't get elected, all you gan do is sit around for the next few years bitching about the guys who are in control.

boilergirl1 07-16-2005 01:23 AM

i only have one thing to say about the whole mess....if more us citizens would just vote and participate in the process (not at the national level) at the local level meaning local reps also city politics then we would stand a slim chance of changing life back to what we started out for 200+/- yrs ago. I'm all for protecting children but this whole thing begs the real question "Where in the sam hell are these kids' parents!!!!" "And why aren't they keeping better track of their own children?"

ok I'm of my rant my apologies to you lilith for even going
party on peeps and vote,vote,vote.

jseal 07-16-2005 06:56 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by boilergirl1
...party on peeps and vote,vote,vote.


boilergirl1,

A lady after my own heart! :)

moose 07-16-2005 07:57 AM

I’m not sure if this has been suggested yet but why not just move the site to another country that is not regulated by us laws.........that’s my two cents worth

fredchabotnick 07-16-2005 10:14 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by boilergirl1
i only have one thing to say about the whole mess....if more us citizens would just vote and participate in the process (not at the national level) at the local level meaning local reps also city politics then we would stand a slim chance of changing life back to what we started out for 200+/- yrs ago. I'm all for protecting children but this whole thing begs the real question "Where in the sam hell are these kids' parents!!!!" "And why aren't they keeping better track of their own children?"

ok I'm of my rant my apologies to you lilith for even going
party on peeps and vote,vote,vote.


Sadly, I don't think more people voting would help (until we can get these people out of power). It's the money talking. The religous right is throwing a ton of cash at them. And they're taking it.
As for the parents, that would imply personal responsibility. Which, as Americans, we apparently are unwilling to take. Just my opinion, and yes, I'm a little jaded.

patricknsally 07-30-2005 04:45 PM

I didn't realize the policies changed before I posted some pics of my wife on this thread: http://www.pixies-place.com:81/foru...ead.php?t=25832 Are those ok? The main one I was worried about was this one where she is reaching down like she is about to finger herself... Would that count as a no-no? I am not reporting anything, just asking a question... so don't count this as a report ;)

Looks like we aren't going to be able to post all the pics we wanted to in the couple forum... And just when we were becoming a little less shy...

That yahoo group you mentioned pixiesorphans won't let us sign up for it, is there a way to get in? It looks locked down from the outside, it isn't able to be searched and if you type in the url directly it says you aren't allowed to enter w/o being a member, and no way to sign up that I could see... our yahoo id is the same as it is here, patricknsally. Sorry if this was already covered, I couldn't find any other info on it...

Lilith 07-30-2005 05:32 PM

Her pics are beautiful and the one you pointed out is fine! You can PM Alasse regarding Pixiesorphans.

Lilith 07-30-2005 05:34 PM

Oh! and welcome to Pixies!!!!!

patricknsally 08-02-2005 12:17 AM

does spanking fall under the "sadistic or masochistic abuse"? What about pics of someone about to be spanked?

I wouldn't consider it to fall under that, but I'm not the one in charge of the new guidelines so I wanted to check with you first.

Thanks
P&S

Lilith 08-02-2005 07:36 AM

Only Alberto knows:p. We must remediate problems with any REPORTED posts.

wyndhy 08-02-2005 10:35 AM

hint hint ;)

Archon 08-17-2005 11:51 PM

I think you're overreacting here, if you read the entire chapter, it clearly applies to child pornography, including the sections cited.

What you perhaps ought to be concerned about is section 2252b, to wit:

Quote:
(a) Whoever knowingly uses a misleading domain name on the Internet with the intent to deceive a person into viewing material constituting obscenity shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

(b) Whoever knowingly uses a misleading domain name on the Internet with the intent to deceive a minor into viewing material that is harmful to minors on the Internet shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 4 years, or both.

(c) For the purposes of this section, a domain name that includes a word or words to indicate the sexual content of the site, such as “sex” or “porn”, is not misleading.

(d) For the purposes of this section, the term “material that is harmful to minors” means any communication, consisting of nudity, sex, or excretion, that, taken as a whole and with reference to its context—

(1) predominantly appeals to a prurient interest of minors;

(2) is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole with respect to what is suitable material for minors; and

(3) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.

(e) For the purposes of subsection (d), the term “sex” means acts of masturbation, sexual intercourse, or physcial [1] contact with a person’s genitals, or the condition of human male or female genitals when in a state of sexual stimulation or arousal.


What exactly constitutes a "misleading domain name" is not really specified, paragraph c does state explicitly that the words "sex" or "porn" in the URL cannot be termed misleading - change your URL to pixiesexplace.com, or whatever, and I don;t see where you are prosecutable under this law, no matter what members post - as long as there are no legal monors, i.e., under the age of Eighteen depicted performing any of the sexual acts mentioned - which was already properly disallowed and monitored before this law took effect.

Doesn't seem to be anything really new, the porn film industry has had to keep records for years concerning proof of age, a perfectly reasonable precaution I think most would agree, and this mainly updates that law for the internet as far as I can tell.

The kicker here I think is section 2252b above, concerning misleading URL's - any site with a URL without the words "sex" or Porn" in it, is technically fair game.

I suppose it could be enforced in bad faith, i.e., if every porn site on the internet has to maintain records of every performer in every image posted on their site, it's gonna take up an awful lot of disk pace, and most of them steal these pics from each other anyway - section - I think they'll have their hands full just going after the child porn however. I get popups and redirects to sites offering what appears to me to be adolescent models on a regular basis - still, to be in full complience with the law, you'd have to maintain the records as described - a photocopy of the birth certificate, and a legitimate photo ID - a drivers liscence or state ID card probobly - I doubt too many poster will want to go to the trouble, not the proprieters of Pixies willing to keep it all on file, I dunno.

In any case, I'd consult an actual lawyer familiar with these types of laws before getting too wound up.

On the plus side, drawings of any sexual act have been ruled to be perfectly legal, including child porn - so if this is as far reaching as you seem to believe, I'm gonna do booming business. No child porn or rape though, gotta have some standards.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.