![]() |
I wear my tin foil jock strap all the time...just in case someone rips my pants off.
|
I have watched it 5 times...now just wish it would go away...
|
Quote:
No question - he was the WORST thing about the show. How is that man famous? |
Quote:
Because he made friends with some talented people and used them to get famous. Then, instead of writing any of his own music, he ruined a bunch of other's people songs. |
Definitely a stunt. But I mean...it was only a boob.....what the hell is all the fuss about.....personally I think Madonna et al.'s lesbian kissing threesome was much more riskue.....I mean women wear less than JJ at the Oscars!!
|
The problem was that it was inappropriate for that audience. I have no problem with showing my boobs or anyone else doing it where appropriate (see the 33 threads below) but it was a sporting event not a strip bar.
|
I personaly liked the entire thing, up until that point. I just didn't understand the statement I guess. Why just one boob? I am a fan of all of the performers though. But I can also understand that they were all directed at a specific audience and typicaly in the past they have had a wider range and variety of performers.
|
And another thing... lol
Really though, besides the boob flash, how about the freak dancing Janet and Justin had going on. My daughter was visiting relatives during the game, but had she been watching it with me... well, let me put it this way, I am glad she wasn't watching. There's a time and place for that and the Superbowl is neither. As it is, she still came home from school Monday and told me that all the kids at her school were talking about the Superbowl; the half-time show specifically. Oh yeah, forgot to mention... she's in elementary school. |
Could be worst. Could have been her Wacko brother with the tits. He is at his Dr so much they may do a tit job at no extra charge!
|
Quote:
LMAO @ WI. :D |
:eek:
OMG! Steph's back! I saw her shadow over me.:eek: ------^ Does this mean 6 more weeks of HELL are coming?:( |
ya know, I just dont understand really, a human body part is a natural thing, and its wrong if we see one on TV?
ya know, it really doesnt matter to me, but I dont know how they can say a bare breast is worse than all the violence and killing they show, again I dont mind all of it, lol but the "experts" thinks its ok to show the blood, guts, killing and mayhem to a kid but not a natural body part? it might scar them and offend? I just dont get it |
I agree that I would prefer my child be exposed to nudity over violence any day but *I* get to make that choice. I allowed my child to tune into a football game. Had I decided to let him watch a movie that showed an exposed breast, that would have been my choice, but by exposing herself at what is a traditionally non-nude event she took that choice away from me. If she came to the middle school and did it there she would have been arrested...regardless she exposed herself in front of many children without the consent of anyone.
|
Who cares? The furor over it is a gas!!!
|
The whole thing is a lot of GAS! :rolleyes:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.